Blog

Work phases 4 and 5: consent and detailed design

📐 Article7 min read

What you will learn What is owed in both phases, why consent design is weighted strikingly low at three per cent, why detailed design counts for more on interiors than on buildings, and how depth of design relates to later variations.

Between the developed design and information ready for tender lie two phases weighted very differently: three per cent for one, twenty-five for the other. The ratio of one to eight bears no relation to the actual effort of the first.

Together they carry 28 % for buildings and 32 % for interiors, which makes this stretch weightier in fee terms than the whole of design up to the concept. The distribution within the stretch is meanwhile extremely uneven.

Work phase Buildings Interiors
4 · Consent design 3 % 2 %
5 · Detailed design 25 % 30 %
Total 28 % 32 %

Work phase 4: consent design

Weighting: 3 per cent for buildings, 2 per cent for interiors.

This phase covers preparing and compiling the submissions and evidence for public law consents or approvals, lodging the documents, and supplementing and adapting the design documents and evidence. The catalogue is short; the effort behind it is not.

The low weighting is the most striking point in the whole service profile, and it sits in tension with actual effort. Four factors drive that effort without appearing in the weighting.

Cost driver Effect
The federal state each state has its own building code with the force of statute; procedures differ down to their names, and so does the volume of documents
The procedure exemption, simplified and full procedures generate very different effort; special building types bring their own ordinances
The building class governs the requirements for fire safety and certification and hence the volume of specialist input
The number of parties involved heritage, nature conservation, neighbours and public bodies can multiply the coordination effort

Work phase 5: detailed design

Weighting: 25 per cent for buildings, 30 per cent for interiors.

Detailed design covers working up the solution ready for construction, drawn presentation of the object with all information necessary for construction, preparing the basis for the other specialist designers and integrating their contributions, and updating the detailed design during construction. The last item reaches into the construction period and does not end at award.

It is the heaviest design phase and the point at which the quality and economy of the eventual construction are decided. Incomplete detailed design generates variations, and on a scale that routinely exceeds the effort of completing it.

For interiors it weighs still more heavily at 30 per cent. The reason is substantively plain: a pure interiors commission avoids large parts of the consent and procurement work while demanding more detailing.

A point of classification: updating the programme was brought into the basic services of this phase with the 2013 version, as was updating the detailed design during construction.

The order is not always the order of the numbers

A practical point rarely found in overviews: phases 4 and 5 frequently run in parallel or overlap. The numbering describes a logic, not a sequence.

Once the consent documents are lodged, detailed design begins while the procedure is still running. That is customary and economically sensible, but it carries a risk: conditions attached to the consent can force changes to work already done.

Two precautions reduce that risk, and both belong in the contract rather than in a verbal understanding. They cost nothing to prepare.

Precaution Content
Recorded client approval for starting detailed design early, including acknowledgement of the risk
Contractual provision on how additional effort arising from consent conditions is handled

Without both, the designer bears a risk they did not create. The condition comes from the authority, the extra effort stays with the practice.

Detailed design is the lever against variations

The economic core of this stretch lies in a relationship clients rarely see early enough: the extent of the detailed design determines the extent of later variations. What is not designed here is negotiated later.

An item missing from the bill of quantities, or unclearly described, is not tendered, not priced and not ordered. It appears during construction as a variation, at a point when competition no longer exists.

An argument follows that is rarely made in fee negotiations and that holds: cutting the detailed design reduces the fee by a fraction of the variation exposure it creates. Transferring detailed design to the contractor is, economically, transferring authority over the detail to the party that benefits from variations.

On the cost side, the article on cost management covers the relationship between depth of design and cost certainty. That article also explains why the room for management is practically closed after award.

The transition to procurement

Detailed design is the basis for the bills of quantities and therefore for procurement. Between the two lies a change of ordering: design proceeds by element, tendering by trade.

That change also acts on cost planning, because from the pre-tender estimate onwards ordering additionally proceeds by procurement package. The system is covered in the article on trade-oriented cost structure.

The procurement phases themselves are covered in the article on work phases 6 and 7. That article also sets out how the weighting of those two phases differs between buildings and interiors.

What to watch on partial commissions

This stretch is where partial commissions most frequently occur. Two arrangements are common.

Situation What it means Chargeable
Commission up to work phase 4 the client has the consent prepared and awards the later phases to a contractor or another designer 27 % for buildings
Commission without work phase 5 detailed design goes to the contractor; permissible, but it shifts responsibility for the detail solution the remaining phases

In both cases only the percentages of the phases transferred may be charged, and the agreement must be in text form. The system is covered in the article on partial commissions.

This article reflects the position of the rules and case law at the date of checking and serves professional orientation. It does not constitute legal advice and does not replace assessment of the individual case.

Frequently asked questions

The permit design and the detailed design. They differ in content and do not always run in sequence.

Because parts of the detailed design can start before the permit. The article describes the usual overlaps.

Because it carries the tender documents and prevents variations. Its depth decides how construction runs.

That the design fully supports the specification. Gaps become visible there, and expensive.

HOAI work phases: fees and service profiles for architects