Blog

Solar energy and roof area

📐 Article5 min read

What you will learn Why roof area affects the requirement, what the exception says exactly, what it means for design, what comes from the European level, and why it cannot be fixed later.

Roof orientation is usually an architectural choice. In the Estonian energy performance requirements it is also a legal fact, which makes this a special case.

1. Why roof area affects the requirement

The logic is sequential, and every link is necessary. The chain starts from the roof area.

The nearly zero-energy level presupposes the use of renewable energy, which for a house or smaller building generally means a solar electricity system. That in turn requires roof area of suitable orientation and sufficient size.

Where this is absent, the required level is not attainable however well the building is insulated. The regulation therefore provides an exception based on fact rather than intention.

2. What the exception says exactly

According to professional sources the wording is specific, and it contains three separate conditions. They are read separately.

The exception applies where a building does not have enough roof area facing the sun and unshaded by other objects to install a solar electricity system of the capacity needed to reach the nearly zero-energy level. In that case the new building's energy performance value must meet the low-energy building requirements.

Condition Character
Orientation a fact to be evidenced
Absence of shading a fact to be evidenced
Sufficient area a fact to be evidenced

All three are facts to be evidenced rather than matters of judgement, and they must be shown during the procedure. The precise wording and conditions must be checked against the regulation in force.

3. What it means for design

Four consequences, and the third is the most often forgotten. It concerns the geometry of the roof.

The siting of the building on the plot becomes an energy question, and roof shape and pitch must be assessed earlier than usual. Shading from neighbouring buildings and mature trees must also be assessed, because it is a condition of the exception, and it can change over time if the neighbouring plot is built on.

Relying on the exception has to be a conscious decision, because it determines the level of the entire remaining solution, not merely whether a solar system is installed. The decision should be documented.

4. What comes from the European level

A new requirement moves in the same direction and is already in force rather than pending. It concerns installing solar energy.

According to institutional sources, member states must ensure that all new buildings are designed so as to optimise their solar energy generation potential based on the solar irradiance of the location, with the aim of enabling the cost-effective installation of solar technology later. Application starts from a fixed date.

Accounting for solar potential therefore becomes part of design even where no system is installed immediately. The precise transposition into Estonian law must be checked against the legislation in force, since it is recent, but the direction is clear.

5. Why it cannot be fixed later

Three reasons, and they are all geometric. Roof orientation follows from the siting of the building, which is not changed after design. Roof shape is a structural decision, and shading depends on a location that cannot be chosen later.

All three are settled in the first design phase, which makes this a typical early decision: no later choice of equipment repairs any of them. They are not changed later.

Summary and four practical rules

The nearly zero-energy level presupposes renewable energy, which for a smaller building means a solar electricity system, and that requires suitably oriented and sufficient roof area. Where orientation, absence of shading or area is insufficient, the low-energy level applies, and all three conditions are facts to be evidenced during the procedure. From the European level comes the further requirement to design new buildings so as to optimise their solar energy generation potential, even where no system is installed immediately.

Four rules: assess roof orientation, pitch and shading in the first design phase. Document the shading where the exception is relied on. Allow for future shading, for example the building rights of the neighbouring plot. Treat solar potential as a standard design question rather than an addition.

This article offers professional orientation as at the date of verification. It replaces neither the regulations in force nor the assessment of a competent specialist.

Frequently asked questions

A new requirement is already in force and moves in the same direction. Its wording contains three separate conditions.

The orientation, the pitch and the shading. All three are settled in the first design phase.

Yes, but that must be a conscious decision and be documented. The exception determines the rest of the solution.

In the first phase, because roof geometry is not changed later. A late decision is expensive.

Building energy performance in Estonia