Blog

How to determine the applicable regime

📐 Focus6 min read

What you will learn Five questions in order, why the date comes first, what to document, the most common errors, and what to do in a borderline case.

Determining the type of procedure does not require knowing the law by heart. It requires asking the right questions in the right order, and in autumn 2026 the first question matters more than usual.

1. Five questions in order

Each narrows the options, and the order is part of the method. Swapping the steps gives the wrong answer.

Order Question Why it sits here
1 When the procedure is or was launched determines which rules apply
2 What the subject matter is: works, supplies or services determines the row of thresholds
3 What the estimated value is excluding VAT, for the procurement as a whole determines the basis of comparison
4 Which side of the thresholds it falls on determines the field of procedure
5 Whether the authority is a classic or a utilities sector authority thresholds differ

Only then is the type of procedure chosen. The choice follows from the threshold.

2. Why the date comes first

Here is the situation characteristic of autumn 2026. Two sets of thresholds run in parallel.

Procurements launched before 1 September 2026 fall under the three tier system and the old thresholds. Those launched after that date fall under the two tier system and the new thresholds.

Construction procurement €120,000 Launched 25.08.2026 Launched 05.09.2026
Applicable threshold public procurement threshold €150,000 not exceeded, simplified €60,000 is simplified threshold €100,000
Procedure full procedure simplified procedure
Tender deadline 15 days 25 days
Abnormally low tender check does not apply, below €150,000 does not apply, below €500,000

The same value therefore sits in two different procedures depending only on the launch date. Starting with the date is not a formality, it determines every subsequent answer.

This is the same pattern as in building permit procedures and energy performance requirements, covered in separate guides: the date of application or launch determines which version of the rules applies. The pattern recurs across construction law.

3. What to document

Four things must be on record. The basis and date of the estimated value calculation.

The reasoning for the choice of procedure, with a reference to the applicable threshold. The reference has to be written down.

Where the procurement is divided into lots, the reasoning for the division. That is the point most often challenged.

Which version of the law applies, where the procedure was launched near the transition. The launch date settles it.

The fourth is new and temporary, but it is exactly what will be asked in challenge proceedings in autumn 2026. Adding one sentence to a procurement preparation memorandum costs a minute; its absence costs hours in a dispute.

4. The most common errors

Four errors all lead to the wrong procedure. Each of them is avoidable.

Error Why it arises Likelihood in autumn 2026
Using the old threshold in September or later habit high
Using the term public procurement threshold after its abolition the term has been in use for years highest
Calculating value lot by lot where the lots form a whole wrong definition of the whole moderate
Calculating with VAT, although thresholds are net inattention moderate

The second is the most likely in autumn 2026, because the term disappears at once and no new name replaces it. A document referring to the public procurement threshold in a procurement launched in September refers to something that does not exist.

5. What to do in a borderline case

Three steps. Calculate the value more carefully and document the basis.

Consider using the higher regime voluntarily where the line is very close. That reduces the risk of challenge.

Ask the Ministry of Finance where necessary, which advises in the field of public procurement. A written answer is worth having.

The third is underused, although the advisory service exists and is free. Borderline cases are precisely the ones that get challenged, and an official position obtained before the procedure is launched is the cheapest protection available.

In summary, and four practical rules

Determining the applicable regime runs through five questions, of which the first, the date the procedure is launched, determines all the rest in autumn 2026. The same €120,000 construction procurement is a full procedure with a 15 day deadline in August and a simplified procedure with a 25 day deadline in September.

Four rules: fix the launch date before anything else. Drop the term public procurement threshold where the procedure is launched in September or later. Document the basis of the calculation and the reasoning for the choice of procedure. Use the official advisory service in a borderline case rather than relying on assumption.

This article serves professional orientation at the date of checking. It does not replace the Public Procurement Act or information published by the Ministry of Finance.

Frequently asked questions

Step by step and in a fixed order: first the estimated value is calculated, then compared against the thresholds in force, and only then is the type of procedure chosen. Swapping the steps gives the wrong answer.

The one in force on the day the procedure was launched. That date must be recorded in the file, since in autumn 2026 two sets of thresholds run in parallel.

The basis of the estimated value calculation, the reasoning for the choice of procedure with a reference to the applicable threshold, and the reasoning for any division into lots.

Yes. Voluntary use of the higher regime is permitted and sensible close to the line, since it reduces the risk of challenge.

Public construction procurement in Estonia: thresholds, procedures and the 2026 reform