Aller au contenu principal

Budget overrun in construction: causes, scale and how to avoid it

📐 Focus6 min read

The gap between a project's forecast cost and its final real cost is among the most sensitive subjects in construction economics. International studies show that more than 80 % of construction projects exceed their initial budget, with gaps running from a few per cent to several times the sum foreseen. Understanding why those gaps occur is the first condition of controlling them.

The scale of the overruns observed

  • Ordinary residential projects: an average gap of 8 to 15 % between the developed-design estimate and the final cost
  • Commercial projects and public facilities: an average gap of 12 to 25 %
  • Complex projects, high-rise, pools, specialist public buildings: gaps of 20 to 50 % are frequent
  • Refurbishment: the least predictable, with overruns of 30 to 80 % not rare
  • Source: the professional observatories and academic studies on megaprojects. These figures exclude deliberate changes of brief that increase the area or the level of specification.

The seven principal causes

Cause 1: the initial estimate is too optimistic

Commercial pressure and the desire to start push costs down in the early phases. The concept estimate, precise to ± 20–30 %, is presented as a budget when it is only an order of magnitude. If the brief is not adjusted when the design moves on, the initial budget becomes an arbitrary constraint disconnected from reality.

Cause 2: insufficient ground investigation

The ground is the most under-estimated risk factor in construction. A geotechnical survey not carried out exposes the project to discoveries during excavation: unanticipated rock, a high water table, shrinkable clay, contamination. Those discoveries can multiply the foundation cost by two to five. The cost of a survey, 2,000 to 8,000 € according to area, is negligible against the overrun risk.

Cause 3: changes of brief during design

Every change to the brief after the outline stage generates rising costs. A wall moved at concept stage costs nothing. The same move during construction means demolition, rebuilding, an effect on the other packages and additional time. The rule of exponentially rising change costs applies in construction as in every complex project.

Concept stage The cost of a change: 0, no work has been done
Outline design The cost of a change: 1, a few hours of redrawing
Developed design and planning The cost of a change: 10, redrawing every drawing and statement
Tender The cost of a change: 50, partially relaunching the tender, potential variations
Construction The cost of a change: 100 to 500, demolition, rebuilding, effects on other packages, delay

Cause 4: items forgotten in the overall budget

Early estimates often cover only the construction works, forgetting items that collectively represent 25 to 45 % of the total budget:

  • Design fees, 10–16 % of the works cost
  • Technical control, health and safety coordination, structural warranty insurance, 2–5 %
  • External works and utility connections, 5–15 % according to distance
  • Landscaping, fencing, parking
  • Furniture, equipment unrelated to the construction, signage
  • Finance costs where the project is funded by borrowing
  • Rehousing costs or the cost of operating during the works

Cause 5: risks on site

Even a perfectly prepared site meets the unforeseen: uncharted services discovered, exceptional weather, a subcontractor failing, equipment delivered late. It is to cover those risks that the contingency, 3 to 10 % of the works cost according to the stage and the nature of the project, is indispensable, and it must never be used as an adjustment variable to present an attractive budget.

Cause 6: material volatility not taken into account

Between signing a contract and completing an 18- to 24-month site, material prices can move significantly. Without a contractual revision clause the contractor bears the rise alone, and passes it on in claims or in degraded quality. The rise in steel, up 65 % in 2020–2022, and in structural timber, up 70 %, weakened many contracts signed at a firm price without revision.

Cause 7: under-estimating refurbishment

Refurbishment projects are structurally less predictable than new build. Older buildings reveal their surprises during demolition: asbestos, lead, wood-boring insects, poor structural quality, services out of standard. The contingency must be raised to 15–25 % of the works cost for refurbishment, against 3–8 % for new build.

How to control the gap

During design

  • Carry out a geotechnical survey before developed design, without exception
  • Definitively approve the brief before developed design begins; every later change will be expensive
  • Require an estimate by trade from the outline stage, not just a global ratio
  • Systematically build fees, insurance, external works, contingency and tax into the budget
  • Never present an estimate to the client without an explicit precision band

At tender

  • Check the coherence of the contractors' offers: a very low offer often conceals unrealistic assumptions that reappear as variations
  • Insert a price revision clause on contracts running more than 12 months
  • Hold 3–8 % of the budget in reserve for the unforeseen, outside the firm budget

During construction

  • Put a monthly financial dashboard in place: commitments, balances available, forecast out-turn
  • Institute a formal variation authorisation procedure: no variation without the client's written agreement and prior pricing
  • Follow the monthly index to anticipate the contractual price revisions

The fundamental principle A forecast budget is never a guarantee of final cost; it is an estimate at a given moment, with a precision tied to how far the design has advanced. The best protection against overrun is the quality of the early studies, rigour in the change authorisation procedure, and a correctly sized contingency.

Articles liés : How to estimate the cost of a project · Financial risks in construction projects · Expenditure items on a construction site

Cost estimates, pricing schedules, development appraisals, summary notes. Produce in minutes the deliverables you prepare manually today. First project free. → quostra.com

The nature of the figures quoted

The percentages and amounts quoted on this page are orders of magnitude for framing, not measurements. They illustrate mechanisms and proportions, and they substitute neither for a tender exercise nor for an estimate prepared on drawings.

The overrun percentages cited come from analyses of French projects and from academic publications. The good practices described correspond to the standards of French professional design work.


Sources: the BT construction cost indices published monthly by INSEE on its 2010 base, used to update the figures · construction cost statistics from SDES, the statistical service of the ministry responsible for construction · regulatory texts published in the Journal officiel and consolidated on Légifrance for the requirements cited.

Construction economics: the complete guide for professionals
Votre prochain dossier

“Votre prochain dossier, on s'en charge.”

L'économie de la construction à la demande, pour les cabinets d'architectes.

Déposez votre projet
Lancement sous 72h ouvréesLivrables à vos couleurs